Logo of Sligo Law Group PLLC featuring a stylized white depiction of the United States Capitol building atop three stacked books on a dark blue background.

NEWS

Sign Up for Our Weekly Newsletter for Updates on News, Last Week in Congress, and Upcoming Events

News Alerts Josie Skinner News Alerts Josie Skinner

The One Big Beautiful Bill Act: What Does it Mean for Education?

On July 4, 2025, the President signed H.R. 1—the "One Big Beautiful Bill Act"—into law, enacting sweeping changes across nearly every area of domestic federal policy, including K–12 and higher education. Sligo Law Group has prepared a breakdown of the Act's most consequential education provisions for organizations working to understand and navigate its impacts.

Read More
News Alerts Josie Skinner News Alerts Josie Skinner

Trump Administration Announces Significant Changes to Eligibility for Head Start, Adult Education, Career and Technical Education Programs, Among Others

On July 10, 2025, the Departments of Education and Health and Human Services announced new legal interpretations that reverse over 20 years of guidance, classifying adult education, postsecondary CTE, and a broad array of HHS programs—including Head Start—as "federal public benefits" subject to PRWORA immigration-status eligibility and verification requirements. ED's interpretive rule explicitly states that Plyler v. Doe does not extend to adult or postsecondary education programs, with immediate operational implications for grantees under WIOA Title II and the Perkins Act.

Read More
News Alerts Josie Skinner News Alerts Josie Skinner

Supreme Court Decision in Mahmoud v. Taylor Raises New Questions for Schools and Educational Agencies

In a 6–3 decision, the Supreme Court ruled that a Maryland school district's refusal to allow religious families to opt their children out of LGBTQ+-inclusive curriculum materials substantially burdened their free exercise rights and triggered strict constitutional scrutiny—a meaningful departure from the longstanding Employment Division v. Smith framework. The decision raises the legal bar for school policies that incidentally burden religious beliefs, even neutral and generally applicable ones, and increases litigation exposure for districts and educational agencies that deny religious accommodation requests.

Read More